The painting was on the
back of the canvas Cittą
studi of the same year. Both works date back to the
debut of Sassu as an artist, when he gradually takes
distance from the second futurism with which he had
participated to the Venice Biennale in 1928 with Bruno
Munari, both encouraged by Marinetti. This painting is one
of the very first works of a religious subject, like the
famous Ultima cena
of the same year, and presents the same characteristics.
In fact, in both paintings the biblical characters are
portrayed in an urban context, specifically in Milan.
Milan is the main
character of Sassu's primitivism, right in those years
when the city was changing so much in the eyes of the
artist, who always represents it in a geometrical
structure, still legacy of the futurism, but with the
twist of the melancholy and loneliness that is typical of
the paintings of this period. In fact, Cittą
studi itself is a desolated landscape, like that on
the background of this work.
The Christ here
portrayed by Sassu could be any man, like in Ultima cena of the same year, where all the apostles wear suits and
ties. There is no trace of the temple, as if the city
itself was the scenery of the biblical episode, and in
which the merchants seem to be people walking by.
The colours are lighted up with a diffused light and the
shapes are voluntarily little detailed. The painting
allows us to foresee Sassu as a colourist, as he will soon
blossom with his renowned Uomini
rossi.
"Sassu's
primitivism is not restricted to an interest for a humble
humanity, with the most elementary feelings and
aspirations. It regards even religious subjects with a
spirituality that gets into daily life and is filled with
an immediate emotional participation, of still a people's
intonation, out of dogmatic conceptualism and didactic
issues. From all this derive religious paintings permeated
with flavour, which almost hide the educated
"sources" (we have mentioned above Sassu's
predilection for Angelico and Masolino) and manage to
embody both souls of the poetic and of the painting of the
artist in figurations dense with ideality and at the same
time, but without debasing the spiritual content, with a
"spontaneous" humanity." (Caramel, 2000)
|